Monday, June 25, 2007

Flight 77 Black Box Shows Major Flaws in the Official Story



After several weeks of tireless efforts by pilotsfor911truth.org there has been a startling and very important discovery involving Flight 77.

The painstaking task of processing official data has resulted in a full "decode" of what the NTSB (US National Transportation Safety Board) claim to be the complete raw data output from the Flight Data Recorder of Flight 77.

Pilotsfor911truth have managed to achieve something that only some airlines, the military and one of the very few specialists in crash investigation in the world could normally carry out.

The ‘raw data file’ given out under FOIA request is more or less worthless unless you have access to very specialist software costing upwards of $100,000 USD.

Normally, the chances of a member of the public being able to ever get this type of file decoded are about 10000/1.
But these aren’t normal circumstances and obviously they weren’t counting on the `1` this time…..were they?

This data however has again produced more questions than answers, for example the data recording STOPS over a mile and a half from the Pentagon.

Raw data has confirmed the accuracy of the NTSB animation that was acquired by a truth group member under a FOIA request from the NTSB last August. This information is incredibly useful as it categorically shows that the plane was nowhere near the 5 light poles that were reportedly ripped from the ground by Flight 77 – a claim that appears in the Official 9/11 Commission Report.

Another astonishing discovery is that the data also confirms that the last figure of altitude given was 273 feet above ground level. (The pentagon is 71 feet tall). This is from radio altitude so it’s accurate to within just several feet.

The VOR (A data entry figure that is used to determine the distance from an object, in this case a transmitter at the Airport near the Pentagon) gives a last distance of 1.5 miles from F77 to the transmitter. Combine this information with the last figure of given altitude and also with speed of the plane (530 mph) and simply something just doesn’t add up.

At the speed the plane was moving this puts Flight 77 2 seconds away from the face of the Pentagon. At that point the height was such that the plane could NOT have nosedived fast enough to have hit the face of the building where that hole was seen: the gravity forces at the acceleration required would buckle and simply cause an airframe to break up.

Analysis is ongoing (the spreadsheet of data is about 4 million cells of data long) but it does confirm that the flight path does NOT match up to the damage leading up to the Pentagon.

Interestingly the path DOES match up to eyewitness testimony, some of whom saw two planes and cemetery workers have reported that they saw a jet fly over the Pentagon at the time of the blast.

(Eyewitness interviews have been released in a film called the PentaCON.)

NTSB’s Jim Ritter - who signed off the Flight 77 study – was contacted by pilotsfor911truth.org but he refuses to make any comment.

An FBI team named ‘PentBOM’ (who commandeered jurisdiction of the F77 issue from the NTSB) were also contacted. However, they too cannot make comment as the PentBOM team has since been disbanded. How convenient.
All the audio from these conversations was also recorded.

Another piece of truly hard evidence makes its way into the public domain and with gritty efforts like this we really can show that 911 Truth is in this for the long haul – until a new full and independent investigation is forced.

Watch Calum Douglas present his investigation into the flight data recorder from Flight 77 to an audience at the Indian YMCA in Fitzroy Square, London on 8th June 2007. - source

Thursday, June 14, 2007

U.S. Doctor Smeared For Raising Drug Concerns

When a well-respected doctor raises concerns about the side effects of an important medicine, you'd expect drug safety officials to investigate. Instead, a spokesman for the US Food and Drug Administration is alleged to have chosen a different strategy: smearing the doctor in question.

Steve Nissen, chair of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, investigated the safety of the diabetes drug Avandia, in a study published in The New England Journal of Medicine this March. Avandia is approved by the FDA, but Nissen found that it significantly increased the risk of heart attack. It was the latest blow to the FDA, which has been repeatedly criticised for failing to spot dangerous side effects.

According to ABC News, FDA spokesman Douglas Arbesfeld emailed health reporters drawing attention to a blog that accuses Nissen of focusing his criticism on drug manufacturers that do not run trials at the Cleveland Clinic - a charge Nissen rejects. The FDA declined to comment. - source

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Pentagon Confirms It Sought To Build 'Gay Bomb'

A Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military proposal to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting.

Pentagon officials on Friday confirmed to CBS 5 that military leaders had considered, and then subsquently rejected, building the so-called "Gay Bomb."

Edward Hammond, of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, had used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

As part of a military effort to develop non-lethal weapons, the proposal suggested, "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."

The documents show the Air Force lab asked for $7.5 million to develop such a chemical weapon.

"The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soldiers to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistably attractive to one another," Hammond said after reviewing the documents.

"The notion was that a chemical that would probably be pleasant in the human body in low quantities could be identified, and by virtue of either breathing or having their skin exposed to this chemical, the notion was that soliders would become gay," explained Hammond.

The Pentagon told CBS 5 that the proposal was made by the Air Force in 1994.

"The Department of Defense is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform," said a DOD spokesperson, who indicated that the "gay bomb" idea was quickly dismissed.

However, Hammond said the government records he obtained suggest the military gave the plan much stronger consideration than it has acknowledged.

"The truth of the matter is it would have never come to my attention if it was dismissed at the time it was proposed," he said. "In fact, the Pentagon has used it repeatedly and subsequently in an effort to promote non-lethal weapons, and in fact they submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider."

Military officials insisted Friday to CBS 5 that they are not currently working on any such idea and that the past plan was abandoned.

Gay community leaders in California said Friday that they found the notion of a "gay bomb" both offensive and almost laughable at the same time.

"Throughout history we have had so many brave men and women who are gay and lesbian serving the military with distinction," said Geoff Kors of Equality California. "So, it's just offensive that they think by turning people gay that the other military would be incapable of doing their job. And its absurd because there's so much medical data that shows that sexual orientation is immutable and cannot be changed." - source

Friday, June 8, 2007

HAARP And Mind Control



Google Earth

Google Earth is an amazing tool, putting satellite imagery of the entire world into the hands of anyone who downloads the free program. It is so powerful, in fact, that it has been used to make several new archeological discoveries since it's release.

Here are some interesting Google Earth videos:

Google Earth's Secret Images


Secret And Hidden Places at Google Earth


The coordinates for these places:

01. Google Pool: 37°25'20.41"N 122° 5'6.00"W
02. Airplane: 50°12'47.26"N 8°52'7.31"E
03. Tent: 28°29'43.15"N 81°34'50.07"W
04. Indian 1: 6°42'51.37"N 42°11'42.82"E
05. Black Line & Fire on ice: 69° 3'7.72"N 41° 8'29.66"W
06. BAR: 39°49'21.77"N 3°28'44.50"W
07. Star: 37°24'1.66"N 116°51'58.85"W
08. Pyramid: 37°37'38.49"N 116°50'26.44"W
09. Eddie Fuck: 53°32'18.35"N 1°20'44.17"W
10. Nude Dutch People: 52° 4'43.34"N 4°19'58.12"E
11. Nude German Woman: 52°30'31.46"N 13°20'6.90"E
12. English Crop Circle: 53°31'54.33"N 1°21'24.93"W
13. Firefox-Logo: 45° 7'25.87"N 123° 6'48.97"W
14. Nazi-Building: 32°40'33.83"N 117° 9'28.36"W
15. Reversed Ship: 35° 9'18.21"N 129° 8'51.37"E
16. Bomber: 52°20'10.98"N 0°11'43.17"W
17. Indian 2 (with i-pod): 50° 0'38.19"N 110° 6'48.31"W
18. Donut Store: 25°57'0.25"N 97° 8'50.29"W
19. Giant of Tarapacá: 19°56'56.86"S 69°38'1.81"W
20. Italian Crop Circle: 44°40'52.79"N 10°19'6.39"E
21. Radar Station: 18°20'39.01"N 66°45'8.79"W
22. Sailing/Pirate Ship: 33°51'13.07"S 151°13'59.47"E

Google Earth Is Not Funny Anymore


The Truth About Google Earth


Area 51 On Google Earth


The World's Mysterious Places
This tour of the world's most mysterious places on Google Earth includes (in order of appearance) Oak Island, Area 51, the Pyramid of the Sun & Moon, the Piramide de Cuicuilco, various figures from Nazca, the Atacama Giant, Loch Ness, Arbor Low, Avebury, Silbury Hill, Stonehenge, St. Michael's Mount, Kerloas Menhir (largest menhir in France), Rennes-le-Chateau (low-res I'm afraid), the Pyramids of Egypt (Giza, Sakkara, Bent Pyramid of Senefru), The Kaaba, Ankor Wat, the White Pyramid of China, Ayres Rock, the Olgas, and Maree Man.

Ludicrous Diversion - 7/7 London Bombings

On the 7th of July 2005 London was hit by a series of explosions. You probably think you know what happened that day. But you don’t.

The police have, from the onset of their investigation, chosen to withold from the public almost every bit of evidence they claim to have and have provably lied about several aspects of the London Bombings.

The mainstream news has wilfully spread false, unsubstantiated and unverifiable information, while choosing to completely ignore the numerous inconsistencies and discrepancies in the official story.

The government has finally, after a year, presented us with their official ‘narrative’ concerning the event. Within hours it was shown to contain numerous errors, a fact since admitted by the Home Secretary John Reid. They have continuously rejected calls for a full, independent public inquiry. Tony Blair himself described such an inquiry as a ‘ludicrous diversion’. What don’t they want us to find out?

The Secret Agenda of Atmospheric Manipulation



Back in 1995, a document titled "Owning the Weather in 2025" was submitted to the director of the United States Air Force, under a disguised notion that it was a fictional report and was not intended to be applied to real-life scenarios. The document was a detailed research analysis paper which described the potential of developing aerospace technologies, and more importantly, how they might best be used to harness, control and manipulate the natural forces of weather on this planet.

The technologies and capabilities described in this report have now become a reality, and have been documented all over the world.

The "Space Preservation Act of 2001" was introduced on the floor of the House of Representatives by Dennis Kucinich and was an attempt to legislate the use of certain types of advanced weaponry, and not surprisingly, did not pass. Although Kucinich is just another gear in the NWO mechanism, the first-draft edition of this bill contains some very startling admissions to the types of weaponry the United States Air Force has been developing since the end of WWII, including such categories of weaponry as "biological", "electromagnetic", "tectonic", and most disturbingly, "chemtrails."

This film attempts to show that chemtrails are not a hoax, they are real, and they are part of an international conspiracy aimed not only at controlling the elements, but also at ascribing this new technology immediately to war-fighting applications.

The 2nd Cold War has arrived here in the 21st century, and it will now be a race for total technological dominance of Earth's atmosphere.